|
|
George Washington and the Paradox of Slavery
Introduction

With respect to the other species of property, concerning
which you ask my opinion, I shall frankly declare to you
that I do not like even to think much less talk of it....
George Washington to Alexander Spotswood, 1794.
How could the founding fathers who envisioned a nation where all men are
created equal also hold other human beings in firm bondage and preserve the
concept of slavery? This is a question that has plagued historians for decades.
Through his will, George Washington provided not only for the emancipation of
his slaves, but for their education so that they would be self-supporting as
freed men and women. No other founding father, including Thomas Jefferson, would
set his slaves free, much less provide for their education. How did Washington
-- who did little to prevent prevent the spread of slavery or promote abolition while President --
come to this decision?
During the Revolutionary War, Washington objected to the use of slaves and free blacks in
the army. On November 12, 1775 he signed an order excluding blacks from serving
in the army. Washington was forced to rethink his stance the army's recruiting
policies failed to enlist enough men to serve in the army, particularly in light
of the number of blacks who fled to the British army after Lord Dunmore's
proclamation promising freedom in return for enlistment. After the war,
Washington's stance on slavery continued to be inconsistent, expressing concern
that slaves who enlisted in the Continental Army not be repossessed by their
owners while at the same time hiring a agent to locate his own slaves who he
thought may be in New York.
Washington's friend and comrade, the Marquis de Lafayette, was among those
who openly debated the contradiction between liberty and slavery in the new
nation. "I would have never drawn my sword in the cause of America, if I
could have conceived that thereby I was founding a land of slavery." He was
appalled that slaves continued to be transported after the Revolution aboard
ships flying the American flag. In February 1783, while writing to Washington to
inform him that the preliminary treaty of peace had been signed on January 20,
Lafayette also proposed
a scheme whereby the two men would purchase an estate and free Washington's
slaves, using them as tenants:
Now, my dear General, that you are going to enjoy some ease and quiet, permit
me to propose a plan to you, which might become greatly beneficial to the black
part of mankind. Let us unite in purchasing a small estate, where we may try the
experiment to free the negroes, and use them only as tenants. Such an example as
yours might render it a general practice; and if we succeed in America, I will
cheerfully devote a part of my time to render the method fashionable in the West
Indies. If it be a wild scheme, I had rather be mad this way, than to be thought
wise in the other task.
Washington put off any immediate action, but it appears that he was
interested in Lafayette's experiment. In 1785, Lafayette purchased 125,000 acres
in Cayenne, a plantation that came with slaves. Lafayette did not immediately
free his slaves, but did pay them for their work and provided some education.
However, Lafayette's experiment only lasted a few years. In 1792, he was
imprisoned and his property was confiscated and sold off by the Revolutionary
government in France.
During his presidency, Washington did little to advance the cause of
abolition. He was aware of the fragility of the new republic and the potential
for a dispute over slavery to destroy it. Historian Dorothy Twohig writes:
"From Washington's occasional comments on slavery expressing his desire to
see it disappear from the new American nation it is difficult to decipher how
deep his sentiments ran. It is likely that he had come to disapprove of the
institution on moral grounds and that he considered it a serious impediment to
economic development. Although he did not make sufficient comments on the
institution of slavery for us to be certain, it appears that his opposition
dealt more with the immorality of one man holding ownership over another than
with the cruelty and abuse to individuals that slavery might engender. But there
is no indication in his correspondence that he advocated any immediate policy of
abolition. Obsessed with order both in his personal life and in politics, he
would hardly have contemplated saddling the fragile new nation with the enormous
problems resulting from immediate abolition--the disruption in the labor market,
the care of blacks too old or too sick to work."
Upon his return to Mount Vernon, Washington developed and improved
his holdings on his plantations and slavery continued to be the primary source
of labor. When his father died in 1743, Washington inherited ten slaves. By the
time of his own death in 1799, there were 317 slaves working on his
five plantations. Washington owned 164 outright; 153 came as part of his wife
Martha's dower from her first husband, Daniel Parke Custis. The remainder
represent skilled slaves that Washington rented from nearby slaveholders. Washington's
views on slavery were for the most part expressed privately. Although he was
interested in the well-being of the slaves on his plantations, he was probably
driven by concern for their economic contributions to the plantation. In 1792,
Washington wrote to his manager at Mount Vernon: "It is foremost in my
thoughts, to desire you will be particularly attentive to my Negros in their
sickness; and to order every Overseer positively to be so likewise; for I am
sorry to observe that the generality of them, view these poor creatures in
scarcely any other light than they do a draughthorse or Ox; neglecting them as
much when they are unable to work; instead of comforting & nursing them when
they lye on a sickbed."
While Washington showed signs of repentance for perpetuating slavery in the
new republic, his decision to free his slaves through probate may have been made
abruptly. In the nineteenth century, Benson Lossing published a letter from
Martha Washington, original now lost, describing a dream Washington had of his impending
death. It is believed that Washington composed his final will shortly
thereafter. In it, Washington made a startling provision:
Upon the decease of my wife, it is my Will & desire that
all the Slaves which I hold in my own right, shall receive their
freedom. To emancipate them during her life, would, tho'
earnestly wished by me, be attended with such insuperable
difficulties on account of their intermixture by Marriages with the dower
Negroes, as to excite the most painful sensations, if not disagreeable
consequences from the latter... and I do hereby expressly forbid the Sale, or
transportation out of the said Commonwealth, of any Slave I may die possessed
of, under any pretense whatsoever. And I do moreover most pointedly, and most
solemnly enjoin it upon my Executors hereafter named, or the Survivors of
them, to see that this clause respecting Slaves, and every part thereof be
religiously fulfilled at the Epoch at which it is directed to take place;
without evasion, neglect or delay....
Washington died five months after drafting his will. After his death, Martha
grew fearful that the Mount Vernon slaves would kill her to hastened their
emancipation. One year after his death, Martha Washington freed all of her
husband's slaves. When she died in May 1802, Martha possessed only one slave in
her own name, a mulatto named Elish who she bequeathed to her grandson, George
Washington Parke Custis, and his heirs forever.
SOURCES: Dorothy Twohig. "That
Species of Property": Washington's Role in the Controversy Over Slavery.
In George Washington Reconsidered, Don Higginbotham, ed., University
Press of Virginia, 2001; Henry Wiencek. An Imperfect God: George Washington, His Slaves, and the
Creation of America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003.
National History Standards

Materials compiled in this document can be used by
educators to fulfill the following National
History Standard for Grades K-4:
STANDARD 4: How democratic values came to be, and how they
have been exemplified by people, events, and symbols.
Standard 4C: The student understands historic figures
who have exemplified values and principles of American democracy.
K-4: Identify historical figures who believed in the
fundamental democratic values such as justice, truth, equality, the rights of
the individual, and responsibility for the common good, and explain their
significance in their historical context and today. [Assess the importance of
the individual in history]
K-4: Describe how historical figures in the United States and other parts
of the world have advanced the rights of individuals and promoted the common
good, and identify character traits such as persistence, problem solving, moral
responsibility, and respect for others that made them successful. [Assess the
importance of the individual in history]
Primary Resources

-
DESCRIPTION: Portrait,
George Washington
ARTIST: Charles Willson Peale
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: 1772
SOURCE: The Papers of George Washington
REPOSITORY: Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia
-
DESCRIPTION: Portrait,
Martha Washington
ARTIST: James Peale
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: 1796
SOURCE: The Papers of George Washington
REPOSITORY: The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association, Mount Vernon,
Virginia.
-
DESCRIPTION: Painting,
Washington as a Farmer at Mount Vernon
ARTIST: Brutus Stearns
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: 1851
SOURCE: George
Washington: A National Treasure
REPOSITORY: The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association
-
DESCRIPTION: Washington
& family at Mount Vernon
ARTIST: Alonzo Chappel
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: Printed on border: "Entered according to
act of congress AD 1868 by Johnson Fry, & Co. in the clerks office of the
district court of the southern district of New York."
REPOSITORY: New York Public Library
-
DESCRIPTION: Fugitive
slave advertisement for PERES, JACK, NEPTUNE, and CUPID by George Washington
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: August 20, 1761 in Maryland Gazette
(Annapolis)
NOTES: See also Lathan A. Windley, "Runaway Slave Advertisements
of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson" The Journal of Negro History
(Oct. 1978): 373-374. Ad reprinted in W.W. Abbot and Dorothy Twohig, eds., The
Papers of George Washington, Colonial Series, vol. 7, January 1761-June 1767
(Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1990), 65-68.
SOURCE: The Papers of George Washington
-
DESCRIPTION: Census
of slaves at Mount Vernon
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: 1799
NOTES: Completed shortly before Washington's death
SOURCE: The Papers of George Washington
REPOSITORY: Mt. Vernon Ladies Association
-
DESCRIPTION: The
Will of George Washington
DATE CREATED/PUBLISHED: Mount Vernon, July 9, 1799
NOTES: Transcription
also available.
SOURCE: The Papers of George Washington
REPOSITORY: Fairfax County Court House, Book H-1, pp. 1-23
Additional Media Resources

The Papers of George Washington
George Washington
Papers at the Library of Congress, 1741-1799
George
Washington: A National Treasure
George Washington's Mount Vernon
Lafayette
and Slavery
Additional Instructional Resources

Learning about
George Washington. From the George Washington Papers
George Washington: American Revolutionary.
From A&E Classrooms.
George Washington: Founding Father.
From A&E Classrooms.
Explorations:
Indentured Servitude and Slavery. From Digital History.
George Washington: The Living Symbol
Secondary Resources

Conroy, Sarah Booth. "The
Founding Father and His Slaves" The Washington Post February
16 1998.
Hurrelbrinck, Nancy. "Freeing
his slaves is one of Washington's greatest legacies." Inside UVa
(January 2001): 8.
Pogue, Dennis J. "George
Washington and the Politics of Slavery" Historic Alexandria Quarterly
(Spring/Summer 2003): 1-10.
Twohig, Dorothy. "That
Species of Property": Washington's Role in the Controversy Over Slavery.
In George Washington Reconsidered, Don Higginbotham, ed., University
Press of Virginia, 2001.
Wall, Charles C. "Notes
on the Early History of Mount Vernon" The William and Mary
Quarterly (Apr. 1945): 173-190.
Wiencek, Henry. An Imperfect God: George Washington, His Slaves, and the
Creation of America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003.
Associated Heritage and Preservation Organizations

Copyright and Other Restrictions

Access to materials linked within these document packets is intended for educational and research purposes. The written permission of the copyright owners and/or holders of other rights (such as publicity and privacy rights) is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. The responsibility for making an independent legal assessment and independently securing any necessary rights rests with persons desiring to use particular items in the context of the intended use.
Password Access to Materials

The use of any user name and password to access materials on this web site constitutes an agreement by the user to abide by any and all copyright restrictions and is an acknowledgement that these materials will be used for personal and educational use only. In most instances, the username aaco and password aaco# will work. Contact ref@mdsa.net if you have any questions or have difficulty accessing files.
Credits
Teaching
American History in Maryland is a collaborative partnership of the Maryland State Archives and the Center for History Education (CHE), University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), and the following sponsoring school systems: Anne Arundel County Public Schools, Baltimore City Public School System, Baltimore County Public Schools, and Howard County Public Schools.
Other program partners include the Martha Ross Center for Oral History, Maryland Historical Society, State Library Resource Center/Enoch Pratt Free Library, with assistance from the National Archives and Records Administration and the Library of Congress. The program is funded through grants from the U.S. Department of Education.
This document packet was researched and developed by Nancy Bramucci.
|